A well-structured sales compensation plan drives performance, supports business growth, and engages top talent. The right mix of base salary, commission, and bonuses depends on your industry, sales cycle, and hiring strategy. Some businesses emphasize stability with a higher base salary, while others push for aggressive revenue growth with commission-driven models. The key is ensuring your plan aligns with company objectives while remaining competitive in the market.
This guide provides high-level insights into essential components of a strong sales compensation plan, strategies for structuring incentives around business goals, and practical insights to get you started. We always recommend consulting with sales experts to develop a strong, competitive compensation plan for your industry and the caliber of talent you are trying to attract and retain.
The Primary Components of Your Sales Compensation Plan
Strong sales compensation plan examples are built on three primary elements: base salary, commission, and bonuses. These elements are most often combined, each playing a distinct role in driving performance and aligning sales efforts with your business objectives. The right balance depends on sales cycles, deal complexity, and company priorities. Here’s a breakdown of each component:
Base Salary
A base salary gives your team financial security, allowing them to focus on long-term relationship-building rather than immediate transactions. It is essential in consultative, enterprise, and technical sales roles where deals require multiple touchpoints and extended closing cycles. Regarding attracting talent, it is the only objective part of your compensation plan, meaning that it is the single most important component when trying to attract top talent.
A well-calibrated base salary will help you reduce turnover and reinforce a strategic, customer-focused sales approach. Companies that rely on complex deal structures, multi-stakeholder sales processes, or long-term account management typically incorporate a higher base pay to ensure consistency and sustained engagement. Salary structures vary widely based on industry norms, competitive benchmarks, and overall business strategy. Here are some common base structures to consider as you begin building your compensation plans:
Salary Structure | Description |
Fixed Salary (salary-only compensation plan) | A set annual or monthly salary that does not fluctuate based on performance. These are uncommon in the sales world and usually found when relationship management is key. |
Salary Bands | Pay ranges based on experience and performance levels, providing structured progression. Often used in larger organizations with defined career paths. |
Step-Based Salary Increases | Predefined salary increases tied to tenure, certifications, or consistent performance, reinforcing retention and professional development. |
Geo-Based or Territory-Based Adjustments | Salaries vary based on location and cost-of-living differences, ensuring compensation remains competitive across multiple regions. |
Guaranteed Base with Performance-Based Adjustments | A set annual or monthly salary that does not fluctuate based on performance. These are uncommon in the sales world and usually found when relationship management is key. |
Blended Salary (Base Pay + Equity or Profit Share) | A base salary offset by stock options or company profit-sharing incentives, commonly used in startups and high-growth firms. |
Sales Commission
In addition to a base salary, most corporate sales compensation plans allow commissions to be earned based on sales performance. This commission-based compensation directly ties earnings to performance, making it a powerful tool for driving revenue and keeping your sales team engaged. Unlike base salary, which provides financial stability, commission structures offer increased (and in some cases unlimited) earning potential, rewarding top performers and ensuring compensation aligns with business growth.
Well-designed commission models maximize productivity, reinforce profitability, and attract high-caliber sales professionals. The proper structure for your business will depend on your deal complexity, sales cycles, and company objectives. Some businesses balance commission with base salary to reduce risk for their sales professionals, while others (although uncommon) adopt fully commission-based models to push aggressive revenue growth and potentially reduce the financial risk for the business. An ideal plan will balance creating a compensation plan that attracts the best talent in your industry while maintaining a profitable and business-friendly cost structure. Below are the most common commission structures you will encounter:
Commission Structure | Description |
Salary + Commission +/or Bonus | The most widely used structure, combining base salary with commission and sometimes performance bonuses. It balances financial stability with revenue-driven incentives. The base-to-commission ratio varies by industry, sales cycle, and company strategy. Most commonly, you will find a 50/50 to 70/30 ratio of salary to commission depending on the sales cycle, deal size, and industry norms. |
Tiered Commission | Commission rates increase as sales reps surpass predefined targets. For example, a rep may earn 5% on sales up to $100,000 and 8% on sales beyond that. Usually called accelerators, this structure incentivizes exceeding quota and rewards top performers. |
Recoverable Draw Against Commission | A company-provided advance that must be repaid through future commissions. The rep may owe the company money if commissions don’t cover the draw. It is offered to help sales reps afford the ramp-up period while reducing employer risk. It should be noted that it does add financial pressure on sales reps. |
Non-Recoverable Draw Against Commission | A company-provided advance that does not require repayment. Used to support new hires or bridge income gaps in long sales cycles. Because the employer assumes the risk, this structure is usually time-limited. |
Residual Commission | Reps continue earning commissions on renewals or repeat business, commonly used in commercial insurance sales and other industries where long-term customer relationships drive ongoing revenue. |
Profit-Based Commission | Reps earn commission based on deal profitability instead of total revenue. Many companies tier commission structures based on both revenue and profit margin to encourage a balance between volume and high-margin sales. This model is often used in industries where discounting impacts bottom-line performance. |
Uncapped Commissions | No earnings limit allows top performers to maximize their income based on results. This structure prevents artificial ceilings that might discourage sales reps from exceeding their quota and/or “sand bagging” deals where the rep pushes sales into the future to ensure being paid on a deal. |
Usage-Based Commission | Commissions are tied to ongoing customer usage or renewals rather than initial sales. This model aligns incentives with long-term client value and can be particularly helpful when usage starts small and grows over time. |
Team-Based Commission | Commissions are shared among a group of sales professionals, fostering collaboration. Sometimes found in enterprise sales, this model ensures teams work together on complex, high-value deals that require multiple touchpoints. It is also found in pharmaceutical sales where multiple sales reps have overlapping territories. |
Accelerator Plans | Commission rates increase once reps exceed their quota. For example, a rep earning 7% on sales up to $500,000 may receive 10% on sales beyond that. This model strongly incentivizes overperformance. |
Straight Commission | Sales reps earn 100% of their income from commissions, with no base salary. While this structure offers high earning potential, it also increases financial risk and is typically used in independent sales roles such as real estate and insurance. It is rarely found in corporate b2b sales roles as it dramatically limits the caliber of talent attracted to this type of plan. |
Performance Bonuses
Bonuses are targeted financial incentives that drive your team to go above and beyond immediate revenue generation. Unlike commission, which directly rewards closed deals, bonuses can be structured to push sales reps beyond quota, secure high-value contracts, or improve customer retention. They provide flexibility in shaping sales performance without requiring fixed base pay or commission rate adjustments.
Effective bonus structures ensure reps remain engaged, align incentives with long-term business goals, and reinforce collaboration. Because they are discretionary, you can adapt them to changing priorities, market conditions, or strategic objectives. Below are some of the most commonly used sales bonus structures.
Bonus Type | Description |
Performance Bonuses | Awarded to sales professionals who meet and/or exceed quota or other key performance targets. Typically paid quarterly or annually, these bonuses encourage sustained overperformance. For example, a company might offer a $5,000 bonus for exceeding quota by 20%. |
Milestone Bonuses | Given for achieving significant business objectives, such as closing a high-value deal, securing a multi-year contract, or breaking into a new market. These bonuses incentivize long-term strategic wins rather than just transactional sales. |
Retention Bonuses | Designed to reduce turnover by rewarding long-term commitment. A company might offer a $10,000 retention bonus after three years to retain top talent and ensure team stability. |
Profit-Sharing Bonuses | Employees receive a percentage of company profits based on overall business performance. Common in private firms and startups, this model aligns individual success with the company’s financial health, often as an alternative to equity-based incentives. |
Additional Compensation Terms
Sales compensation plans often include mechanisms beyond base salary, commission, and standard bonuses to fine-tune incentives and manage risk. These additional components influence how earnings are structured, ensuring your sales team is rewarded for the right behaviors while protecting the company’s financial interests.
Sales Quota | The sales target a rep must achieve within a given period, often tied to commission payouts and performance evaluations. |
Sales Accelerators | Increased commission rates that kick in once a rep surpasses quota, designed to reward high performers and drive overachievement. |
Sales Decelerators | Reduced commission rates applied after a certain threshold to prevent excessive discounting or to manage profitability. |
Clawbacks | Compensation adjustments that require reps to return commissions or bonuses if a deal falls through, a customer cancels, or specific conditions aren’t met. |
On-Target Earnings (OTE) | The total expected earnings for a sales rep if they hit 100% of their quota, combining base salary and commission potential. |
Sales Performance Incentive Fund (SPIF) | A short-term bonus or incentive designed to quickly boost sales of a specific product, service, or initiative. SPIFs are typically time-sensitive and used to generate immediate results. |
Build Your Compensation Plan Based on Your Business Goals and Industry
A sales compensation plan should do more than pay employees. It should reinforce your business’s priorities, maintain market competitiveness, and adapt to changing industry conditions. When your compensation structure aligns with company objectives, it will attract talent that is aligned with those objectives while keeping your sales team engaged and focused on the right outcomes. Businesses that fail to structure incentives around long-term goals risk driving the wrong behaviors, such as prioritizing quick wins over sustainable growth.
Aligning Compensation with Business Goals
For best results, your compensation plans should reflect the business’s goals. For example:
- Market expansion: Higher commissions on first-time deals can accelerate entry into new markets.
- Profitability focus: Profit-based commission models encourage sales reps to prioritize high-margin transactions.
- Customer retention: Residual commissions or bonuses tied to contract renewals incentivize long-term client relationships.
If the compensation plan is not aligned with your company’s objectives, sales reps may chase immediate commissions at the expense of strategic business growth.
Market Competitiveness and Industry Considerations
A compensation plan is only effective if it attracts and retains top sales talent. Strong performers will always have other opportunities and will compare your pay structure to competitors’. Staying competitive requires using industry salary benchmarking data and analyzing internal hiring and retention trends. If your compensation plan isn’t keeping pace, you risk losing your best salespeople to better offers.
Using Sales Compensation Plans to Attract and Retain Top Sales Talent

The strength of your sales compensation plan will make or break your ability to hire and retain high-performing sales professionals. Here’s how you can design your comp plans to sell working at your company and match what top-performing reps are looking for:
Strategy | Explanation | What High-Performing Sales Reps Look For |
Use Compensation as a Recruiting Advantage | Sales professionals want transparency and a clear path to maximizing their income. A well-structured compensation plan makes a company more attractive to high performers and signals that leadership understands how to motivate and reward success. Companies that offer uncapped commissions, competitive base salaries, and performance-driven incentives have a significant advantage in recruiting top sales talent. | Experienced reps expect a straightforward compensation structure that outlines commission rates, quota expectations, and bonus opportunities. High performers look for earning potential that scales with results rather than being limited by arbitrary caps. While financial stability is important, they also want assurance that their commission structure properly rewards effort and performance without exposure to unnecessary risk. |
Create an Earnings Structure That Motivates Reps to Stay | Attracting top talent is only part of the equation—keeping them engaged requires an earnings model that supports long-term retention. Sales reps are more likely to stay when they see a direct correlation between tenure, performance, and financial growth. Compensation plans should reinforce this by offering meaningful incentives that make leaving a costly decision for top performers. | The best salespeople expect their earnings to grow as they gain experience and produce results. They are drawn to plans that increase commission rates or bonuses once they hit specific milestones. Multi-year incentives, such as retention bonuses or equity-based compensation, make staying more appealing by offering long-term financial benefits. Commission stability is also critical, particularly in industries with recurring revenue models where reps expect to continue earning from past deals. |
Balance Compensation with Career Growth & Development | Even the best compensation plans lose effectiveness if reps don’t see a future within the company. Career advancement opportunities are key to retention, and sales professionals are far more likely to stay if they see a clear progression path. Companies investing in training and leadership development create an environment where reps feel valued beyond commission checks. | Top performers look for a company that offers more than just a paycheck—they want a clear route to leadership roles, senior sales positions, or strategic account management. Strong sales organizations provide structured career paths, professional development programs, and access to mentorship or industry certifications. Without these opportunities, even high-earning reps may seek roles that provide financial and professional growth. |
Offer Perks That Make Your Sales Team Want to Stay | While compensation is a primary retention driver, workplace perks can strengthen commitment and improve overall job satisfaction. Competitive benefits and flexible work arrangements give companies an edge in retaining top sales talent, particularly in industries where highly skilled reps have plenty of options. | Beyond their paycheck, sales professionals consider the overall work environment. Flexible schedules, remote work options, and wellness benefits contribute to job satisfaction and work-life balance. Recognition programs—whether through public acknowledgment, performance-based awards, or additional incentives—reinforce a culture that values high achievers. A company that invests in financial and non-financial rewards creates an environment where sales reps want to stay. |
Build a Culture That Sales Reps Want to Be Part Of | A competitive compensation plan won’t make up for a poor company culture. Retaining top sales professionals requires more than strong earnings potential—it demands an environment supporting their success. Organizations that foster collaboration, recognize achievements, and provide the right tools for success will naturally retain their best performers. | Sales professionals stay with companies, celebrating their wins and providing the necessary support to succeed. A positive sales culture includes strong leadership, access to effective sales tools, and a team-oriented environment. While competition drives performance, a cutthroat culture can push performers away. Companies that balance high expectations with genuine support build teams that perform at a high level and stay for the long haul. |
How to Implement a Sales Compensation Plan
A well-executed sales compensation plan should do more than define pay structures—it must drive performance, align with business priorities, and evolve with market conditions. Implementation requires a structured approach to ensure clarity, motivation, and long-term effectiveness.
Step 1: Define Clear Objectives
Before finalizing a compensation plan, businesses must determine the specific outcomes they want to drive. Are you prioritizing revenue growth, profitability, customer retention, or market expansion? The structure should reinforce these goals by incentivizing the right behaviors—rewarding high-volume transactions, long-term client relationships, or team collaboration. Without clear objectives, compensation plans risk encouraging the wrong priorities or failing to align with the company’s sales strategy.
Step 2: Structure the Compensation Plan
With objectives established, the next step is designing a compensation structure that supports them. This includes defining the balance between base salary, commission, and bonuses; determining whether commission rates will be tiered, residual, or profit-based; and setting payout timelines (monthly, quarterly, or annually). A well-balanced plan ensures that sales reps remain financially secure while staying highly motivated to exceed performance targets.
Step 3: Set Realistic Quotas and Performance Targets
Quotas must be ambitious but attainable. Setting unrealistic targets can lead to disengagement and high turnover, while overly easy goals fail to drive peak performance. Companies should use historical data, industry benchmarks, and market conditions to develop fair yet challenging quotas. Adjustments may be necessary based on territory, experience level, or economic shifts to maintain engagement and ensure that sales reps have a legitimate opportunity to exceed expectations.
Step 4: Communicate the Plan Clearly
A sales compensation plan is only effective if sales teams fully understand it. Reps should know exactly how they earn commissions and bonuses, what is required to maximize their earnings, and how their pay scales over time. Providing detailed documentation, hosting training sessions, and using real-world earning scenarios help prevent misunderstandings and disputes. If reps are unclear on how they’re compensated, frustration and disengagement can undermine the plan’s impact.
Step 5: Monitor and Optimize Over Time
A compensation plan should never be static. Regularly reviewing your sales team’s performance data, market trends, and sales team feedback ensures that the plan remains effective. Commission rates, bonuses, or quotas may be adjusted to keep the plan competitive and aligned with business goals. Companies that treat compensation planning as an ongoing process, rather than a one-time setup, will be better positioned to attract, retain, and motivate sales reps.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid Losing Sales Team Members

Even the best types of sales compensation can fail if they are not structured correctly. Business owners often make critical mistakes that lead to confusion, frustration, and turnover among their sales teams. A well-designed plan should be easy to understand, competitive within the market, and aligned with company goals. Below are some common pitfalls businesses should avoid when designing their sales compensation structure.
- Overcomplicating the Pay Structure: A sales compensation plan should be simple enough for sales reps to understand exactly how they are paid. When pay structures become overly complex—with multiple commission tiers, unclear bonus criteria, or too many conditions—sales reps may struggle to calculate their earnings and lose motivation. The compensation plan is failing if sales professionals cannot easily determine what to do to maximize their income.
- Not Being Competitive in the Market: Sales professionals have options and constantly compare offers. If a company’s compensation plan does not match or exceed what competitors are offering, top talent will look elsewhere. Businesses must stay informed about market trends using salary benchmarking data from sources like Glassdoor, LinkedIn Salary Insights, Payscale, and compensation consulting firms. Failing to remain competitive can lead to higher turnover and difficulty attracting strong candidates. If you’re losing sales reps, it’s almost certainly because your compensation plan is no longer market-competitive.
- Setting Unrealistic Quotas: Quotas should be ambitious yet achievable. If targets are too high, sales reps may feel demotivated, believing that earning commissions or bonuses is unrealistic. This can lead to higher turnover, lower morale, and reduced overall performance. Companies should set quotas based on historical sales data, industry trends, and market conditions to ensure they are both challenging and attainable.
- Paying for the Wrong Results: A compensation plan should drive the right behaviors. If incentives are misaligned, sales reps may prioritize short-term wins over long-term business success. For example, if a company rewards revenue volume without considering profitability, reps may close low-margin deals that hurt the business in the long run. Compensation plans should be structured to ensure sales teams focus on high-value activities that contribute to sustainable growth.
- Ignoring Non-Monetary Motivators: Compensation is important, but it is not the only factor that keeps sales professionals engaged. Companies that rely solely on financial incentives while neglecting career growth, recognition, and workplace culture risk losing their top performers. Sales reps want opportunities for advancement, professional development, and a positive work environment. Businesses that invest in these areas alongside their compensation plans will have stronger retention rates.
- Failing to Adjust to Market Conditions: A sales compensation plan should evolve with the business and the market. Economic conditions, industry trends, and company growth all impact how you compensate your sales representatives. Companies that fail to update their compensation plans may find their pay structures outdated, making attracting and retaining talent difficult. Regularly reviewing and adjusting compensation based on performance data and market trends ensures that the plan remains competitive and effective.
Build a Sales Compensation Plan That Attracts and Retains Top Talent
A competitive sales compensation plan does more than pay reps—it drives performance, supports long-term growth, and keeps top talent engaged. The right mix of base salary, commission, and bonuses should align with business objectives while remaining clear, competitive, and scalable. Companies that fail to refine their compensation structures risk losing high performers to competitors with more compelling pay models.
Beyond compensation, high-performing sales teams thrive in environments prioritizing career development, meaningful incentives, and a strong sales culture. Regularly evaluating and optimizing pay structures ensures they remain effective as business needs and market conditions evolve. If you need to refine your sales compensation plan to attract and retain top talent, Sales Talent can help create a structure that maximizes motivation and results.